Follow us on social media for latest updates
Telegram - @FzGroup | Instagram - @FzMovie | Twitter - @FzGroup
Unique (by wings_of_ryu) |
Viewers can be divided into two categories. The first are those who are looking for flashy expensive over the top graphics with some decent dialogue and structure. The second group in this case are those of you out there who love the Dune Series and would rather be in-depth with the plot then see the flashy over the top Graphics. The casting and portrayal of characters in this film FAR surpasses the ones who tried more recently to redo the movie TV version . I Recommend One Thing if you do see this movie. WATCH THE 3 hour version. It goes much more in-depth then the normal version and is <more> |
Outstanding Interpretation (by james-647) |
I've talked to quite a few die-hard Herbert fans who insist that this film is rubbish. Well, I personally feel that this film is one of the most lavish and elegant science fiction movies ever made. I think it's wonderful, and am happy to have it in my collection.The movie itself inspired me to read the next couple of books in the series.I do agree however that there are some scenes that need to be added in a definitive collection. There are a couple of sequences from the Alan Smithee bootleg version - such as when the water of the Fremen warrior that Paul defeated in combat is <more> |
Dune Rocks!!!! (by Allentoker) |
I haven't seen this movie in years,and a couple weeks ago I caught it on TV at my buddy Zak's house and it blew my f***ing mind.Of course, I had time to become a huge David Lynch fan and study cinema intensely since the first time I watched it, but it is still a visually awe inspiring film.It is almost if not just as visually stunning and beautiful, as well as emotionally,psychologically, and intellectually stimulating as Kubrick's 2001:a Space Odyssey.The cast is amazing,practically every good actor you can think of plays in this movie.The makeup effects by Gianetto de Rossi,one <more> |
Why does Lynch hate this one? (by Starbuck-13) |
To begin with, I have to say that I saw the movie first, and read the book years later. This seems to be important: Nearly everybody who read the book first hates the movie, but most of those who saw the movie first seem to like it.Now, why is this so? I cannot really understand it because, in comparition to other movies based on existing literature, what we have here is a film which stays very close to the original story and does not add many new elements.When I read the book, I could see the movie in front of me in nearly every chapter. So I really don't understand what Herbert-Fans had <more> |
So what about a director's cut? (by cedde6) |
I read "Dune" in 1984, prior to watching David Lynch's adaptation but with his film's visuals in mind thanks to the magazines of the time . I fell in love with the book of course and soon after with the movie.Problems during the course of its production, unwise if not poor decisions regarding its visual effects and the pressure of condensing a very complex material in 2 hours mark all conspired against the quality of the piece, the main victims here being the story telling which is really not great and the pace which is somewhat unbalanced and even clumsy . But <more> |
Superb.......A Masterclass.. (by carlsson9000) |
This film is a true master-class of art,the true scale of props/sets costumes+original designs is above all,and compared to today pix elated cartoons/video game made films,is on top 'bar none',such hard work has gone into producing dune and not just a few knobs nerds sitting on their arse's pushing keys on a qwerty to make such effects like in today cheap/made blockbusters what a laugh .The Dune sets are superb,as so is the cast,the story it self is quite simple to follow,unless of course you are simple! It should be placed in an art gallery as a true Masterpiece.The politics <more> |
A very good effort. (by Chris-742) |
Every time I see this film I like it more, yet can see why people would dislike this movie, and I can sum up it's shortcoming this way:Not close enough to the book to humour the people who have read the book, to confusing for people who have not. Thus Lynch managed to get a lot of bad press about this near masterpiece.It is very difficult to fit the plot of Herbert's masterpiece into 130 minutes, but I think Lynch did a good job, sadly he added som stuff that was not in the book. Where Lynch does excel is in setting the mood. To help him he had probably the best possible cast for such <more> |
Love it or hate it, it's a story (by themarina1) |
Over the years, I have come to the understanding that there are two schools of though here. Some people absolutely hate this movie and other absolutely love it. I'm of the latter school, regularly enjoying Lynch's twisted take on the late Herbert's fantastic story. The story follows the House Atreides on a planetary move to the spice mining world of Arakis. With it, comes the power struggle and life and death situations commonly associated with political struggle. Dark and interesting, Lynch has managed to capture all of Herbert's story and mix it with some of his sick and <more> |
One of the few movies with a style of its own (by earnes) |
Seriously, I do not understand why so many people dislike this movie. I think you have to take a couple of things into account. First: It is a 2 hour movie telling a story that spans several hundred pages in a book - so certain losses are just natural. Second: Compared to three times recycled multi-million-dollar-trash like the new Star Wars Episodes, this movie offers something really unique: A style of its own. The mixture between scifi elements, medieval setting and the culture of the the Middle East is excellent and Lynch welded them together into one solid piece of art... even though he <more> |