Every bit as respectable in counter-terrorist circles as Andy Davis' Under Siege, Executive Decision 1996 is astonishingly prophetic when compared to even United 93 2006 . As the best movie about counter-terrorism aboard commercial airliners, this delicious, well-rounded Warner Bros actioner is virtually The Hunt for Red October 1989 at altitude.The 1990s were an era of high-octane franchises. Warner Bros' Bob Daly & Terry Semel indulged their taste for technothrillers; but in 1999 they just quit the studio. Luckily, they got the Lethal Weapon- and Under Siege-franchises, and <more> -Decision into theaters, but movie-going for me simply hasn't been the same.Scribe-duo Jim & John Thomas fought so hard for their knowledgeable screenplay that they received producer credits beside Joel Silver and Steve Perry; but the final product probably owes its coherence to editor/director Steven Baird.I do have one problem with the coherence: the 3x editors who eventually polished the movie never quite extricated themselves from the Col.Austin Travis Steven Seagal subplot with more panache than to simply prematurely expend him. True, Seagal made us cringe whenever he mumbled "ay-sap", but that's no reason to kill him off; although when he bullies his own mission-specialist Dennis Cahill Oliver Platt , Travis seems to invite the audience's lack of trust in his judgment--again mitigating against his sudden loss.I don't much like his commandos in a power-vacuum, either. "Rat" John Leguizamo 's behavior especially feels like nails on a blackboard: he's pushy, twitchy, and is allowed to assume command despite being not nearly the smartest tool in the shed--Jean the airline attendant Halle Berry would've made better leader. His character's hasty promotion apparently satisfied the Latino community clamoring for equal screen time, but for me propaganda is still just propaganda. Leguizamo sucks as the Latino poster-boy. His rep will be much better served when he commands the screen with the precision of, say, Courtney B.Vance from Hunt 1989 .While the general breakdown in discipline supposedly derives from the rushed- and ill-prepared mission itself, the team's embarrassing reactions constitute the screenplay's attempt to show that commando training isn't always adequate.The plot, for the first time, features a High Altitude Rescue Vehicle HARV --in this case an F117 "Nighthawk" stealth bomber, called Ramora, for its "sucker"--with an extensible, pressurisable and thoroughly phallic-looking docking collar. Planes that can't dogfight are called "bombers"--they "move like a fish/ steer like a cow". This method of in-flight commando intrusion has only been theorised. The flight envelope of real 747s doesn't support attached rescue vehicles with large enough docking-collars for humans to fit through, but perhaps the new mega-A380s might. So far that's the only intelligent--yet unpublicised--reason to actually up-size commercial fleets to A380s. Films featuring career intelligence officers are going to be more important in the early 21stC, but this is an early, almost harbinger effort from the late 20th.Decision 1996 has virtually everything: the final depiction of a suicide bombing in England, a frustrated black-ops mission where the intel was correct, just late; a realistically courageous and smart female flight attendant vs a headline-grabbing dumb politician, naval aviators actually worth a damn, a HARV, and Steven Seagal in only a cameo.As observed elsewhere, the Achilles' heel of intelligence-gathering is analysis. Lack of manpower or proper local knowledge loses us the context meaning of what's been gathered, and this is what causes the much-vaunted "intelligence failures". Unfortunately, the single-most devastating CAUSE of this is the politicization of intelligence, as the heartbreaking real-life example of Tall'Afar, Iraq shows TIME, 9/26/2005, pp 24-38 .David Grant Kurt Russell is introduced in the movie as a male analyst learning to fly a Beechcraft Bonanza. The device implies he's an intelligence "weakling" trying to better himself. Analysts typically get little respect from field personnel partly because it's hard to take hits on someone else's best guess; although as we see, analysts deserve quite a bit of respect for often guessing correctly. In the face of unknowns--which in the military is the only kind you get--for missions to succeed, everyone must cooperate well.Throughout the movie, Grant is never overconfident, just a concerned and thoughtful pro. This is NOT typical Kurt Russell, who usually likes to play macho; but he's to be commended for his restraint as the Jack Ryan-like analyst pressed into extraordinary service......Not sure if his repeated attempts enticing women to hockey were necessary, but his friction with Travis later inspires Grant to step up to serve, to honor Travis' memory.Another atypical, completely unfunny performance is turned in by Oliver Platt as the Ramora engineer. He's utterly enjoyable with his one prop--which crescendos significantly later, in the only funny "bit of business" Platt gets.Kudos must also go to Berry, who plays Jean with enormous aplomb--and shimmering eyes. She, almost more than anyone else, becomes the hero of the piece; but the movie successfully imparts that avoiding catastrophe takes everyone's cooperation and it's sometimes still not enough .Jerry Goldsmith's brassy theme music bolsters our confidence in the entire movie. There is such a sea of stress along the way that were it not for his bars, many people might be tempted to opt out. Decision 1996 is instead the thinking man's thrill-ride--with just enough dramatic licence when necessary."We wanted him, and now we got him.....and all the baggage that comes with him", muses Grant at the opening about their recently bagged chief terrorist. He's voicing the pragmatist's problem with the type of political arrogance that besets some US Presidents. The movie cleverly implies that some wily terrorists can and do use America's gung-ho attitude against itself. What do terrorists do with one of their own when he's become too much of a liability?--They give him to the Americans to hold by the tail.I'm sure we're all curious to see what will eventually be made of real-life chief terrorists currently cooling their heels in secret CIA-prisons. 9/10 . <less> |